Skip to Main Navigation

ARMM Social Fund Project

Résumé*

The development goals of the five-year ARMM Social Fund for Peace and Development Project, hereinafter known as the ARMM Social Fund Project (ASFP), are to foster sustaianble development in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM). There are three project components. Component 1 empowers target communities and creates opportunities for increased community participation in reducing poverty and promoting a durable peace. Communities will be able...

* Le résumé de projet étant tiré du document d'évaluation de projet (PAD), du rapport d'évaluation (SAR) ou du document du programme (PGD), il peut ne pas refléter exactement la teneur du projet en son état actuel.

Voir plus

Objectif de développement

The objective of the Project is to assist the Borrower to reduce poverty and to support mechanisms for the promotion of a peaceful and safe environment in the conflict-affected areas in the ARMM Region and in particular to: (a) improve access to social and economic infrastructure and livelihood opportunities; (b) strengthen social cohesion and partnerships between and within targeted communities; and (c) improve local governance and institutional capacities for implementation in the ARMM Region, with a focus on improved participation, transparency and accountability in the allocation and management of public resources by the participating communities, local government units and ARMM Regional Government.

Clé Détails

Projet Détails

  • P073488

  • Closed

  • Matthew Stephens

  • N/A

  • Philippines

  • 26 avril 2002

  • (à la date de présentation au Conseil)

    5 décembre 2002

  • 19 mai 2003

  • USD 63.60 millions

  • B

  • 7 mars 2024

  • 31 mai 2014

  • BANK APPROVED

  • Notes

Finances

Plan De Financement (Millions De Dollars)

Pas de données disponibles.
Org. De Financement Engagements
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development 63.60
Borrower/Recipient 15.86

Financement total du projet (USD millions)

Type de produit/service BIRD/IDA
Engagement BIRD 63.60
Engagement IDA N/D
Engagement BIRD + IDA 63.60
Instrument de prêt
Élément don N/D
Coût total du projet** 79.46

État récapitulatif du financement de la Banque (USD millions) au 31 mars 2025

Télécharger:
Pas de données disponibles.
Org. De Financement Date D'approbation Date De Cloture Montant En Principal Décaissé Remboursements Intérêts, Charges Et Commissions Financières

Activité financière détaillée au 31 mars 2025

Télécharger:
Pas de données disponibles.
Période Org. De Financement Type De Transaction Montant (USD)

Footnotes

Ratings

EXÉCUTION DU PROJET

Name Review Date
Counterpart Funding Satisfactory 2014-05-27
Procurement Moderately Satisfactory 2014-05-27
Project Management Moderately Satisfactory 2014-05-27
Progress towards achievement of PDO Moderately Satisfactory 2014-05-27
Financial Management Moderately Satisfactory 2014-05-27
Monitoring and Evaluation Moderately Satisfactory 2014-05-27
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Satisfactory 2014-05-27

FIN D’EXÉCUTION DU PROJET

INDICATEURBILAN DE FIN D’EXÉCUTION ET DE RÉSULTATS: 01-30-2015
RésultatsModerately Satisfactory
Risques pour les résultats de développementModest
Performance de la BanqueModerately Satisfactory
Performance de l'emprunteurModerately Satisfactory
Performance de l’ÉtatModerately Satisfactory
Organisme d'exécutionSubstantial

NOTATION DE L’ÉVALUATION INDÉPENDANTE

INDICATEUREXAMEN RFE: 10-29-2015RAPPORT D’ÉVALUATION RÉTROSPECTIVE DE PROJET:
Évaluation Des RésultatsModerately Satisfactory N/a
Risques Pour Les Résultats De DéveloppementSignificantN/a
Performance De La BanqueModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Performance De L'emprunteurModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Performance De L’étatModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Organisme D'exécutionModerately SatisfactoryN/a
Qualité Des RfeSatisfactoryN/a
Qualité Du Suivi-évaluationSubstantialN/a

Cadre de résultats

INDICATEURS DES OBJECTIFS DE DÉVELOPPEMENT DU PROJET

INDICATEURNIVEAU DE RÉFÉRENCE EN COURS OBJECTIF
  • Percentage of households reporting reduced travel time and cost of access to communal basic servicesValeur0.000.0025.00
    Date1 janvier 20038 mai 201431 mai 2014
    ObservationWill be assessed in endline survey. Data collection for the endline survey is ongoing.Will be assessed in endline survey.
  • Percentage of households reporting reduced cost of access to local agricultural production facilitiesValeur0.000.0010.00
    Date1 janvier 20038 mai 201431 mai 2014
    ObservationWill be assessed in endline survey. Data collection for the endline survey is ongoing.Will be assessed in endline survey.
  • Number of households with at least one adult family member who learned how to read or write as a result of the Project's Learning, Livelihood and Food Self-Sufficiency programValeur0.0062400.0057900.00
    Date1 janvier 20038 mai 201431 mai 2014
    ObservationThis covers 100 people per village in 624 villages (282 under the original loan and 342 for the Additional Financing). All plannedactivities under this sub-component have been completed. Pre- and post-test results demonstrate that virtually all beneficiariesincreased their reading and writing skills. For example, 50% of beneficiaries started at Level 0, indicating no literacy ornumeracy. At the end of the training, less than 1% failed to advance to Level 1.
  • Average project economic rate of returnValeur0.000.0014.00
    Date8 mai 201431 mai 2014
    ObservationWill be assessed as part of project completion.Will be assessed as part of project completion.
  • Average Local Government Unit cost-sharing rateValeur0.0015.8815.00
    Date1 janvier 20038 mai 201431 mai 2014
    ObservationThis cost sharing ratio is 15.88% for community-based infrastructure, but 35% for the Municipal Block Grant, thus the targetedamount has been exceeded.
  • Direct project beneficiariesValeur0.00988508.001380000.00
    Date1 janvier 20038 mai 201431 mai 2014
    ObservationThe Project Completion Report for the Original Loan claims 597,050 beneficiaries (p. 27). The PMO reports 391,458 from theAdditional Financing. The final number will increase as remaining subprojects are completed during May, but it seems likely theproject will not reach the final target.
  • Conflict affected people receiving benefits in 1st year of project effectivenessValeur0.00138000.00138000.00
    Date18 octobre 201017 octobre 201117 octobre 2011
    ObservationThis was reset for the Additional Financing phaseThis core sector indicator was introduced after the first year of the AF was completed, hence the target exactly matches theachieved amount of beneficiaries, based on PMO reports.Relates to first year of the Additional Financing phase of the project.
  • Increase in household consumptionValeur0.000.005.00
    Date8 mai 201431 mai 2014
    ObservationWill be assessed in endline survey.Will be assessed in endline survey.
  • Female beneficiariesValeur0.0051.4555.00
    Date1 janvier 20038 mai 201431 mai 2014
    Observation
  • Conflict affected ppl receiving benefits in 1st yr of proj. effectiveness–femaleValeur0.0075900.0075900.00
    Date18 octobre 201017 octobre 201117 octobre 2011
    ObservationThis core sector indicator was introduced after the first year of the AF was completed, hence the target exactly matches theachieved amount of beneficiaries, based on PMO reports.Relates to first year of the Additional Financing phase of the project.
  • Proportion of people confident in their ability to influence decisions on identifying local development prioritiesValeur5.000.0025.00
    Date8 mai 201431 mai 2014
    ObservationWill be assessed in endline survey.Will be assessed in endline survey.

INDICATEURS DE RÉSULTATS INTERMÉDIAIRES

INDICATEURNIVEAU DE RÉFÉRENCE EN COURS OBJECTIF
  • Number of communities with improved local infrastructure facilities implemented by the ProjectValeur0.001261.00900.00
    Date1 janvier 20038 mai 201431 mai 2014
    Observation665 from the Original Loan and 596 from the Additional Financing. While some subprojects are not yet complete, full coverage ofcommunities as planned under the Additional Financing has been met. The remaining incomplete subprojects are all cycle 2.
  • Number of LGUs with improved municipal infrastructure facilities implemented by the ProjectValeur0.0012.0022.00
    Date1 janvier 20038 mai 201431 mai 2014
    Observation12 are completed. The PMO expects the remaining seven to be completed before the closure of the project on May 31.This revised target will not be met, as five of the original 24 LGUs have dropped out for various reasons. Thus, the expectedtarget is now 19.
  • Number of Indigenous Peoples beneficiariesValeur0.005168.008000.00
    Date1 janvier 20038 mai 201431 mai 2014
    ObservationThis is the total number of IP beneficiaries as recorded by the PMO. It seems that the target of 8000 was set too high. Eventhough IP villages were targeted and IP safeguards to ensure IP participation were complied with, the target will not be met. Thetotal number is 4000 for the original loan and 1168 for the Additional Financing.
  • Number of established People's OrganizationsValeur0.001261.00900.00
    Date1 janvier 20038 mai 201431 mai 2014
    ObservationThe end target has been comfortably exceeded, primarily because the project overachieved on targets under the Original Loan.
  • Number of sub-projects implemented at technical standards and within budgetValeur0.002703.002600.00
    Date1 janvier 20038 mai 201431 mai 2014
    ObservationThis is 1775 from the original loan and 928 so far under the Additional Financing. Another 150-170 should be completed by the endof May.
  • Number of People's Organizations with Women OfficersValeur0.00995.00800.00
    Date1 janvier 20038 mai 201431 mai 2014
    ObservationThe end target has been met and exceeded.
  • Number of Municipal Teams installed and mobilized in target communitiesValeur0.000.00900.00
    Date1 janvier 20038 mai 201431 mai 2014
    ObservationThis indicator relates to the effectiveness of the Municipal Teams (includes the Municipal Engineer, Municipal Social WelfareOfficer, etc.). 239 such teams have been installed - 108 from the original loan, 108 for the additional financing and 23 for theMunicipal Block Grant. The indicator is supposed to then track in how many of the target communities did the Municipal Teamactually provide technical assistance to people's organizations to implement their subprojects. This assumes that the MunicipalTeam will not be active in all target communities for various reasons (security, funding constrains, workload, politicalconsiderations, etc.). However,it is difficult to track this as the PMO does not gather data on this issue.
  • Beneficiaries that feel project investments reflected their needs (percentage)Valeur0.000.0060.00
    Date1 janvier 20038 mai 201431 mai 2014
    ObservationWill be assessed in endline survey.Will be assessed in endline survey.
  • Beneficiaries that feel project inv. reflected their needs - female (number)Valeur0.000.00455400.00
    Date1 janvier 20038 mai 201431 mai 2014
    Observation
  • Total beneficiaries - female (number)Valeur0.000.00759000.00
    Date1 janvier 20038 mai 201431 mai 2014
    Observation
  • Total beneficiaries - male (number)Valeur0.000.00621000.00
    Date1 janvier 20038 mai 201431 mai 2014
    Observation
  • Beneficiaries that feel project inv. reflected their needs - male (number)Valeur0.000.00372600.00
    Date1 janvier 20038 mai 201431 mai 2014
    Observation
  • Number of POs with indigenous person officerValeur0.00144.00200.00
    Date1 janvier 20038 mai 201431 mai 2014
    ObservationData from the PMO. With the project set to close, this figure will not change.Given the scale of the project, covering around half of all barangays in ARMM, including the few municipalities with IPpopulations, it can be assumed that the project has virtually full coverage of IP villages, thus the target of 200 was seeminglynot realistic. It will not be met.