Org. De Financement | Engagements |
---|---|
Borrower/Recipient | 2.90 |
Special Financing | 20.00 |
P065920
Closed
Zeyad Abu-Hassanein
N/A
13 juillet 2000
(à la date de présentation au Conseil)
7 juin 2005
25 juillet 2005
USD 22.90 millions
N/A
2005
USD 20.00 millions
B
15 janvier 2013
31 janvier 2012
BANK APPROVED
Org. De Financement | Engagements |
---|---|
Borrower/Recipient | 2.90 |
Special Financing | 20.00 |
Type de produit/service | BIRD/IDA |
---|---|
Engagement BIRD | N/D |
Engagement IDA | N/D |
Engagement BIRD + IDA | N/D |
Instrument de prêt | |
---|---|
Élément don | 20.00 |
Coût total du projet** | 22.90 |
Name | Review | Date |
---|---|---|
Overall Safeguards Rating | Satisfactory | 2011-12-31 |
Overall | High | 2011-12-31 |
Project Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-12-31 |
Financial Management | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-12-31 |
Overall Implementation Progress (IP) | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-12-31 |
Counterpart Funding | Satisfactory | 2011-12-31 |
Monitoring and Evaluation | Satisfactory | 2011-12-31 |
Progress towards achievement of PDO | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-12-31 |
Procurement | Moderately Satisfactory | 2011-12-31 |
INDICATEUR | BILAN DE FIN D’EXÉCUTION ET DE RÉSULTATS: 08-30-2012 |
---|---|
Résultats | Moderately Satisfactory |
Risques pour les résultats de développement | High |
Performance de la Banque | Moderately Satisfactory |
Performance de l'emprunteur | Moderately Satisfactory |
Performance de l’État | Moderately Satisfactory |
Organisme d'exécution | Moderately Satisfactory |
INDICATEUR | EXAMEN RFE: 09-30-2013 | RAPPORT D’ÉVALUATION RÉTROSPECTIVE DE PROJET: |
---|---|---|
Évaluation Des Résultats | Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Risques Pour Les Résultats De Développement | High | N/a |
Performance De La Banque | Moderately Satisfactory | N/a |
Performance De L'emprunteur | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Performance De L’état | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Organisme D'exécution | Moderately Unsatisfactory | N/a |
Qualité Des Rfe | Satisfactory | N/a |
Qualité Du Suivi-évaluation | Modest | N/a |
INDICATEUR | NIVEAU DE RÉFÉRENCE | EN COURS | OBJECTIF |
---|
Service consistently meeting standards: Drinking water delivery meets the quality and quantity standards. | Valeur | Drinking Water in the network is 99% disinfected. | Drinking Water in the network is 99.8% disinfected | Drinking Water in the network is 99.8% disinfected |
Date | 31 juillet 2005 | 6 décembre 2011 | 31 janvier 2012 | |
Observation |
CMWU fully functional and operational: Sets clear objectives and monitors the performance of its services through action plans on investment needs and priorities. | Valeur | The CMWU does not exist physically. | Autonomous fully functioning utility exists | Autonomous fully functioning utility exists |
Date | 31 juillet 2005 | 6 décembre 2011 | 31 janvier 2012 | |
Observation | The political environment in Gaza is impeding consolidation of other municipalities |
Capacity of PWA strengthened: PWA monitors water abstraction, groundwater and wastewater qualities on a regular and comprehensive basis and publishes periodic reports about compliance with the standar | Valeur | PWA has its mandate and organizational chart to fu | N/A | PWA will be able to assume its responsibilities as |
Date | 31 juillet 2005 | 6 décembre 2011 | 31 janvier 2012 | |
Observation | AFI, AFII, and AFIII do not have any funds allocated to the corresponding component since the confiscation of PWA offices | N/A |
INDICATEUR | NIVEAU DE RÉFÉRENCE | EN COURS | OBJECTIF |
---|
Water wells operational time | Valeur | 88%. | 90% | 90% of the time. |
Date | 31 juillet 2005 | 6 décembre 2011 | 31 décembre 2009 | |
Observation |
volume of water billed to volume of water produced from all available sources | Valeur | 62%. | 62% | 70% |
Date | 31 juillet 2005 | 6 décembre 2010 | 31 décembre 2009 | |
Observation |
Number of hours all customers receive water each day. | Valeur | 6 hrs. | 6-8 hrs. | 8 hours |
Date | 31 juillet 2005 | 6 décembre 2011 | 31 janvier 2012 | |
Observation | the power deficit in Gaza is the constraint. Customers are adapting to less hours by having in-house storage capacity to ensurecontinuous access |
Wastewater effluent quality meets agreed standards | Valeur | Not determined. | above target using the originally set formula | 85% |
Date | 31 juillet 2005 | 6 décembre 2011 | 31 janvier 2012 | |
Observation | major infrastructure investments are ongoing to improve WWTP in different governorates |
Improvements to annual gross revenue collection | Valeur | 40% | 35-55% in different municipalities | 50% |
Date | 31 juillet 2005 | 6 décembre 2011 | 31 janvier 2012 | |
Observation | CMWU conducted sucessful campaigns to improve collection. Yet collection is low due to prevailing poverty and unemployment |